Valentine Hugo: the Woman who dreamed in Movement
Surrealism, Ballet, and the Art of the Unseen
Happy Sunday and welcome back to Giselle daydreams! Today, I decided to feature a lesser-known Surrealist artist from her male counterparts but worth knowing about, Valentine Hugo.
This post is too long for your mailbox, please move on your browser or via the Substack app to read the entire post.
Valentine Gross (1887–1968) was a woman who moved effortlessly between worlds—visual art, dance, poetry, and the avant-garde. Though best known as a painter and illustrator associated with the Surrealist movement, her relationship with ballet remains an under-explored facet of her legacy. She was not just a participant in Surrealism but a critical bridge between its visual and performative dimensions, bringing the movement’s dreamlike aesthetics into the ephemeral world of dance.
Unlike many women in Surrealism, who were often relegated to the roles of muse or lover, Hugo was an active creator. She painted, she designed, she theorised. Her work with the Ballets Russes and her deep engagement with the movement’s philosophy show her as more than just an observer of the avant-garde; she was its co-architect, shaping its visions in ways that transcended the canvas.
Through her collaborations with Jean Cocteau, André Breton, and Paul Éluard, as well as her lifelong fascination with dance, Hugo wove together the visual and the kinetic, offering a unique perspective on the Surrealist body—not as a passive object, but as a site of transformation. To study her work is to uncover an artist who redefined the way movement could be seen, felt, and imagined.
Ballet, as an art form, has often been associated with strict formalism, technical precision, and classical ideals of beauty. Surrealism, on the other hand, sought to dismantle rigid structures, embracing dream logic, subconscious impulses, and unexpected juxtapositions. What happens when these two seemingly opposite worlds collide?
For Valentine Hugo, ballet was not simply an art of discipline but a gateway into the surreal. Her early career, particularly her work with the Ballets Russes under Sergei Diaghilev, immersed her in an environment where music, movement, and visual art converged to create new modes of expression. The Ballets Russes had already begun breaking away from traditional narrative-driven performances, with choreographers like Vaslav Nijinsky exploring abstraction and psychological intensity. Hugo absorbed these radical transformations, and later, through her Surrealist lens, she reimagined ballet as something even more elusive and fragmented.
Her designs for Jean Cocteau’s Le Spectre de la Rose (1911) and Parade (1917) reflect this sensibility, blurring the line between costume and dreamscape. The sets and costumes she helped conceive did not simply clothe the dancers—they became extensions of their subconscious, turning the stage into an animated canvas of fluid symbols.
But Hugo’s most profound contribution to the relationship between Surrealism and dance was not in physical performance, it was in how she captured movement in her visual art. Her drawings and paintings of dancers—often ethereal, dissolving at the edges—suggest a movement that exists outside of time, as if her figures are caught between reality and dream. Unlike traditional ballet imagery, which freezes movement into controlled perfection, Hugo’s dancers seem to flicker, blur, or evaporate, reflecting the Surrealist idea that reality is never quite stable.
Surrealism had a complicated relationship with the female body. Women were often depicted as objects of male desire, fragmented and fetishised, trapped in the erotic fantasies of artists like Salvador Dalà or Hans Bellmer. Yet Hugo, as both an artist and a woman within the movement, reclaimed the body from this passive role.
Her depictions of dancers—floating, spectral, sometimes faceless—suggested a different kind of eroticism, one that was not about possession but about transformation. She was particularly drawn to the spectral presence of women in performance and fascinated by the way movement could make the body appear both tangible and unreal.
This aligns with the Surrealist obsession with automatism—the idea that creativity should be guided by the subconscious rather than rational control. For Hugo, ballet was not about rigid technique but about the ghostly echoes left behind by movement itself. She captured dancers not in their moments of greatest control, but in their moments of disappearance—when they seemed to dissolve into air, like memories, like dreams.
Though often overshadowed by her male counterparts, Hugo was deeply embedded in the core of the Surrealist movement. She collaborated with André Breton, Paul Éluard, and Max Ernst, illustrating some of the most iconic Surrealist texts. Her marriage to Jean Hugo, great-grandson of Victor Hugo, gave her early access to literary and artistic circles, but she was far more than just a social figure. She was an intellectual force, contributing to the visual and conceptual language of Surrealism in ways that are still being rediscovered.
Her illustrations for Éluard’s Capitale de la douleur (1926) and Breton’s L’Amour Fou (1937) are filled with the same ephemeral quality as her ballet sketches—figures melting into one another, faces obscured, movement hinted at but never fully revealed. She was particularly fascinated by shadows and silhouettes, playing with negative space to create figures that seemed half-present, reinforcing Surrealism’s interest in what is hidden, repressed, or just out of reach.
At the same time, her friendships with dancers and choreographers kept her grounded in the world of physical performance. She saw the dancer’s body as something that could bridge the gap between dream and reality, between the visual and the kinetic. In this way, she stood at the intersection of Surrealist visual art and the theatrical avant-garde, making her one of the few artists to translate Surrealist ideas so seamlessly into the world of movement.
Valentine Hugo’s contributions to Surrealism and ballet remind us that art does not belong to a single medium or discipline. She saw the stage as a canvas, the body as a brushstroke, and movement as a kind of poetry that could not be contained by language or logic. Yet, as with many female artists of her time, her legacy was often overshadowed by the men around her. She was reduced to a footnote in histories of Surrealism, remembered more for her relationships than for her radical vision. But to look at her work is to see an artist who redefined the way we perceive movement, who found a way to paint with dance and dance with paint. In a world where Surrealism sought to unlock the unconscious and ballet sought to perfect the body, Hugo found a way to merge the two—to create an art that existed in the spaces between, where reality flickers and dreams take shape.
FIN.
Thank you for reading this post. If you enjoyed it, please like, comment, share and subscribe. It helps the newsletter grow.
I’ve never even heard of this artist before! Thank you so much for bringing her to our attention, Giselle. I love the first drawings, they look like continuous line work, which is very difficult to do.
When are we gonna get movies, biographies, or TV shows about some of these women artists??💕
Fascinating 🌷